Magic Formula Part 4
If this is your first visit to Three Grahamian Virtues, please take a moment to read the welcome message and site philosophy: http://3gv.blogspot.com/2006/01/welcome-and-3gv-philosophy.html
This article discusses how I actually invest money. Below is a pasting of an email I sent to some outstanding investors (whose incredible sites happen to be linked to from my front page) that details the process I used to form my portfolio on the first trading day of 2006.
Name: Magic Formula 20/20
Source: Magic Formula Top 100
Goal: To buy statistically cheap baskets of Magic Formula stocks most dampened by depressed current expectations
Rationale: This basket hopefully represents the lowest expectation stocks of decent companies in the top 100 of the Magic Formula. They may not all perform swimingly, but I hope any sinking is minimized by the selection process and that they will be positively reassessed by Mr. Market in the coming year
Process:
Measure distance of each stock's price from its 52 week low -- take only those within 20% of their yearly low (38 companies pass)
Of those within 20% of their annual low, compare each stock's P/S ratio to the bottom 20% of its three year P/S range (hence the 20/20 namesake), and take only those within these bottom two deciles (20 companies pass)
Calculate the earnings quality of each (accruals ratio) and take only those with a negative (good) ratio (Down to 7 companies)
Run a conservative intrinsic value calculation to see what expected rate of return a long-term owner might expect from current price (enterprise value) given my set of assumptions. Frankly, this is just a feel-good sanity check. The real return I expect to garner will come from a reassessment of each company's worth and an upward revaluation one year hence.
Here are the 7 companies, some stats, their expected return, and growth and free cash flow assumptions (note: FCF is derived from three year average operating cash flow margins on current revenue less 1/2 capital expenditure margins [a wag at maintenance CapEx]; also, growth rates are loosely based on historical sales/earnings growth and are mostly a function of judgement on my part)
Lexmark (LXK) $5428 million enterprise value; 14% above 52 week low; 48% below upper bound of second lowest P/S decile; -10.3% accrual ratio (anything below -5% is really solid, anything negative is desirable)
Expected Return: 19%
Free Cash Flow: $500 million
Three stage growth: 10% for five years; 5% for five years; 4% terminal growth
Price Paid: $44.87
Valassis Communications (VCI) $1405 million EV; 1% above 52 week low; 27% below P/S decile 2; -6.8% accrual ratio
Expected Return: 14% Free Cash Flow: $141 million Three stage growth: 4/4/4
Price Paid: $29.10
Harvest Natural Resources (HNR) $336 EV; 10% above 52 week low; 34% below P/S decile 2; -5.8% accrual ratio
Expected Return: 41%
Free Cash Flow: $62 million
Three stage growth: 10/5/0
Price Paid: $8.88
Westwood One (WON) $1456 EV; 5% above low; 49% below P/S; -2.9% accrual ratio
Expected Return: 11%
Free Cash Flow: $121 million
Three stage growth: 8/5/0
Price Paid: $16.30
Harley Davidson (HDI) $14327 EV; 16% above low; 15% below P/S; -2% accrual ratio Expected Return: 14%
Free Cash Flow: $903 million
Three stage growth: 10/5/4
Price Paid: $51.44
Boston Scientific (BSX) $20274 EV; 7% above low; 47% below P/S; -.7% accrual ratio
Expected Return: 11%
Free Cash Flow: $1,341 million
Three stage growth: 10/5/2
Price Paid: $24.51
Tribune (TRB) $9438 EV; 1% above; 32% below P/S; -.5% accrual ratio
Expected Return: 13%
Free Cash Flow: $969 million
Three stage growth: 8/5/2
Price Paid: $30.29
An observation that jumps out is that this list truly reflects the undervalued nature of large cap stocks (only one of these sports a sub-$1 billion enterprise value). This selection process is to be repeated every three months to form rotating mini-portfolios of the most currently beaten down names that have solid economic foundations and earnings quality (total number of companies to be owned will probably vary between 30-40).
Name: Magic Formula 20/20
Source: Magic Formula Top 100
Goal: To buy statistically cheap baskets of Magic Formula stocks most dampened by depressed current expectations
Rationale: This basket hopefully represents the lowest expectation stocks of decent companies in the top 100 of the Magic Formula. They may not all perform swimingly, but I hope any sinking is minimized by the selection process and that they will be positively reassessed by Mr. Market in the coming year
Process:
Measure distance of each stock's price from its 52 week low -- take only those within 20% of their yearly low (38 companies pass)
Of those within 20% of their annual low, compare each stock's P/S ratio to the bottom 20% of its three year P/S range (hence the 20/20 namesake), and take only those within these bottom two deciles (20 companies pass)
Calculate the earnings quality of each (accruals ratio) and take only those with a negative (good) ratio (Down to 7 companies)
Run a conservative intrinsic value calculation to see what expected rate of return a long-term owner might expect from current price (enterprise value) given my set of assumptions. Frankly, this is just a feel-good sanity check. The real return I expect to garner will come from a reassessment of each company's worth and an upward revaluation one year hence.
Here are the 7 companies, some stats, their expected return, and growth and free cash flow assumptions (note: FCF is derived from three year average operating cash flow margins on current revenue less 1/2 capital expenditure margins [a wag at maintenance CapEx]; also, growth rates are loosely based on historical sales/earnings growth and are mostly a function of judgement on my part)
Lexmark (LXK) $5428 million enterprise value; 14% above 52 week low; 48% below upper bound of second lowest P/S decile; -10.3% accrual ratio (anything below -5% is really solid, anything negative is desirable)
Expected Return: 19%
Free Cash Flow: $500 million
Three stage growth: 10% for five years; 5% for five years; 4% terminal growth
Price Paid: $44.87
Valassis Communications (VCI) $1405 million EV; 1% above 52 week low; 27% below P/S decile 2; -6.8% accrual ratio
Expected Return: 14% Free Cash Flow: $141 million Three stage growth: 4/4/4
Price Paid: $29.10
Harvest Natural Resources (HNR) $336 EV; 10% above 52 week low; 34% below P/S decile 2; -5.8% accrual ratio
Expected Return: 41%
Free Cash Flow: $62 million
Three stage growth: 10/5/0
Price Paid: $8.88
Westwood One (WON) $1456 EV; 5% above low; 49% below P/S; -2.9% accrual ratio
Expected Return: 11%
Free Cash Flow: $121 million
Three stage growth: 8/5/0
Price Paid: $16.30
Harley Davidson (HDI) $14327 EV; 16% above low; 15% below P/S; -2% accrual ratio Expected Return: 14%
Free Cash Flow: $903 million
Three stage growth: 10/5/4
Price Paid: $51.44
Boston Scientific (BSX) $20274 EV; 7% above low; 47% below P/S; -.7% accrual ratio
Expected Return: 11%
Free Cash Flow: $1,341 million
Three stage growth: 10/5/2
Price Paid: $24.51
Tribune (TRB) $9438 EV; 1% above; 32% below P/S; -.5% accrual ratio
Expected Return: 13%
Free Cash Flow: $969 million
Three stage growth: 8/5/2
Price Paid: $30.29
An observation that jumps out is that this list truly reflects the undervalued nature of large cap stocks (only one of these sports a sub-$1 billion enterprise value). This selection process is to be repeated every three months to form rotating mini-portfolios of the most currently beaten down names that have solid economic foundations and earnings quality (total number of companies to be owned will probably vary between 30-40).
2 Comments:
Excellent blog Ian. Its gr8 to know that there are Graham afficionados around the world. I have a blog of my own on the same but more to do with indian equities. A lot of activity is going on as India (like the USA) is seeing a good surge in stock prices. (and im getting skeptic of the whole thing)
Keep up the good work mate
Warm Rgds
Shankar
small2big.blogspot.com
I'm curious to know where on the 'Net one can do the research needed to come up with the metrics you spell out under process.
I couldn't figure it out in either E*Trade or Yahoo Finance.
Post a Comment
<< Home